Newsroom: June 2018

Trump essentially calls out atheles kneeling for the anthem, makes prison reform a front-page issue (due in no small part to, of all people, reality TV star Kim Kardashian West), Florida went a full year without NICS checks, and an ingenious way to pay for infrastructure.

Thanks to my InSov colleague Catty Conservative for help in gathering the newsroom.

1.) Prison reform. Out of nowhere, prison/sentencing reform is very much on the front burner. Trump has spoken to Kardashian, which led to the pardoning a first-time non-violent drug offender named Alice Marie Johnson, and now is turning to the NFL atheltes who kneeled during the National Anthem to recommend people for pardoning. (A rather ingenious “put up or shut up” move.)

We will absolutely be dealing with prison reform in the Run later this year.

2.) NICS. Somebody in Florida couldn’t log into the Federal NICS system, apparently told nobody, and as a result, nobody reviewed concealed carry applications for upwards of a year.

The problem was discovered by another worker who did bring up the issue. But basically, CCW permits got approved for a year without background checks, a sort of de-facto Constitutional (concealed) carry.

3.) Otto. Ahead of the summit between Trump and the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong Un, another name is coming to the forefront. That of Otto Warmbier, the American student who was imprisoned for 15 months in North Korea, returned home in horrid condition, and eventually died as a result.

Vice President Mike Pence, speaking this week at the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s “Road to Majority” convention, said that he had spoken with Otto’s father, and assured him that “their beloved son, Otto Warmbier, will not have died in vain.”

4.) Infrastructure. The government is the biggest landowner in the country. A bipartisan bill introduced this week suggests selling off a ton of government assets in order to pay down the debt and finance desperately-needed infrastructure projects. According to the draft:

Currently, federal agencies hold more than $2 trillion in debt and lease asset. The sale of a portion of these assets, if expedited, could raise a significant amount of money. The sale of these fixed-rated debt assets at this time will maximize asset value. Interest rates are on the rise, and the Federal Reserve’s quantitative tightening program is on the horizon. As interest rates rise, the value of the agency assets will decline — perhaps substantially. Importantly, the sales will not alter the terms of the loans. The consumer protection obligations associated with eligible Department of Agriculture loans and guarantees will convey with the sale, thereby minimizing impact on borrowers.

Two trillion dollars in assets. I’m realtively sure we’d be able to find a few million dollars worth in there we could could get rid of.

Regardless, it took long enough for Congress to start thinking the path to greater revenue wasn’t taxing citizens to death from every angle imaginable. Progress.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.

Newsroom: May 2018 [Volume 2]

Managed to screw up my own scheduling and release Muscle in April, when it should have hit in May.

So we’ll get back on track in June.

This week, Parkland lawsuits, David Hogg gets Publix to stop making political contributions, and a lesson in how gun control types cover DGUs.

1.) Smith and Wesson. A lawsuit pending against the parent of firearms manufacturer Smith and Wesson has led to the stock of said company jumping 5%. The reason for the surge, according to, is a motion by the plaintiffs wanting “the presiding judge to shield them from financial ruin should the case get tossed out.”

In other words, if the lawsuit backfires, they want to be protected from financial consequences of bringing a clearly frivolous lawsuit to trial. This can only be read as a sign of weakness in the case.

2.) Publix. The so-called “die-in” is back. After Publix, a major grocery store chain, donated money to a Republican politician, Parkland survivor and borderline-ubiquitous gun control advocate David Hogg called for Publix to donate a million dollars to someone he supported.

Publix has responded by canning political contributions altogether.

This has an interesting side effect, however, as my friend and InSov colleague Catty Conservative noted. Namely, that Publix has a history of supporting left-wing candidates and is a major supporter of gun control.

3.) Propaganda. Finally Tonight found this absolute gem. We now have a decent idea of how anti-gunners will cover mass shootings stopped by armed citizens. They will take the reaction to the armed citizen, and claim it was about the situation as a whole. The DGU in Oklahoma City was celebrated as evidence that an armed citizenry can stop criminals. MDA’s Shannon Watts claims that the NRA sees the event itself (i.e. the shooting the armed citizen stopped), as a victory, while completely ignoring the context of that angle, and the armed citizen who brought down the shooter.

She goes even further, claiming that the shooter was the armed citizen people are referring to.

It is a remarkable, and clearly deliberate, dodging of facts that so clearly threaten a narrative that is already fragile.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.

Newsroom: May 2018

Bad business timing from Vista Outdoor, worse business sense from Dick’s, candor on guns from a Democrat Congressman, and a mass shooting in Australia.

1.) Vista Outdoor. The company behind such brands as American Eagle, Federal Premium, and Savage Arms now admits that their announcement looking for people to buy Savage Arms had fairly awful timing. Despite being decided about a year ago, the announcement came shortly after the Parkland school shooting. The company reiterated that it wasn’t about the shooting, and the backlash it set off, but rather getting the company back to its core businesses.

2.) Military parade. Trump’s idea to hold a parade for the military, with the military, got support from Congressional Republicans. Not much more to say there, since the parade is still, at best, in planning stages.

3.) Dick’s Sporting Goods. Whereas the Vista announcement was just bad timing, Dick’s Sporting Goods has wholly committed to the gun control angle in the wake of the Parkland shooting. In addition to removing the sale of rifles from its Field and Stream stores, (which was so badly-received that the magazine distanced itself from Dick’s announcement, Dick’s has now hired three gun control lobbyists.

Gun companies have responded by severing ties with the retailer, in what has become the most-difficult headline to phrase tastefully in recent memory.

4.) Confiscation. Eric Swalwell is a California Congressman. His re-election campaign has an op-ed titled Ban Assault Weapons, Buy Them Back, Go After Resisters. It’s basically exactly what gun-rights people have been saying gun controllers want; a total gun ban, and going after people who refuse to hand in their firearms.

5.) Australia. There was a mass shooting in Australia. Seven people were killed. The event is being treated as a murder-suicide, not as a random massacre. It is noteworthy here, given that Australia comes up fairly regularly in discussions here as a model for gun control. This is the biggest mass shooting in the country since 1996.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.


In Lethal Ignorance, we discussed the basics of first aid, in Improvement, we expanded the discussion to fitness in general.

At this point we have a solid intellectual basis on why being physically active is a good thing (a statement that, in having to even be brought up, is itself an indictment of modern society), and can move to more specific stories, viewpoints, and generally more offbeat takes on the subject of fitness.

This week eschews, for the most part, the broad strokes of Improvement, and the survivalism of Lethal Ignorance. Instead, we’re going to be talking about weightlifting, Crossfit, how being active is good for people academically, and how schools are working to work against that, among other things.

1.) Crossfit/Baseline. It’s worth noting an excellent source for fitness-related news is the Crossfit Journal. While it IS a subscription service for the most part, the team over there puts up excellent content ranging from Crossfit itself, to the healthcare industry, to nutrition (and the political influences shaping it.)

Crossfit’s founder, Greg Glassman, has a particular focus on soda companies. There is an excellent documentary on this subject under the name “Sugar Coated” that beautifully covers how the industry has worked to either hide or distort the health issues sugar can lead to. You’d be surprised how politically charged sugar can be.

While you’re watching documentaries, if you have Netflix, watch “Icarus.” It’s about Russia’s state-sanctioned steroid scandal.

2.) Benefits. Back in Improvement, we discussed the physical benefits of being active. In Minnesota, the state’s Department of Health did a study that found physical activity can help students perform well academically as well.

The Mayo Clinic has also found that excercise can ease depression and anxiety. While the exact links aren’t clear, the believe is that regular exercise releases hormones called endorphins, and over time builds confidence in one’s own abilities.

It’s also a great way to relieve stress. As anybody who has ever done a deadlift can attest.

3.) Powerlifting. Speaking of which, let us move to my wheelhouse: powerlifting. Defined loosely as a competition involving three main lifts (Squat, Bench Press, Deadlift), powerlifting is at the opposite end of the spectrum compared to Crossfit. Whereas Crossfit has also taken on the name “functional fitness” and focuses on explosive movements, powerlifting is much more about raw strength and, to some extent, aggression.

We start, as all strength sports news segments do, at Barbend. There is an op-ed suggesting that powerlifting can sport for nerds, which may also explain my focus on it.

Joking aside, EliteFTS has an article out about how the sport is something just about everybody can participate in.

4.) Independence. Let us close by merging just about all of the Runs on this topic together. The survivalism found in Lethal Ignorance, and the more clinical aspects of Improvement and this Run. They all revolve around one concept: self-reliance. There’s a fantastic article from Reason Magazine’s J.D. Tuccille from December of 2017 on this. In the article, J.D. notes that Libertarians “are rightly quick to complain about intrusions into our autonomy—rules, regulations, and directives that compromise our ability to run our own lives. But nothing limits your independence like an inability to walk down the street under your own power.” Stated differently, you can be as much of a threat to your own independence as any government, if not more than any government. Governments can do a fair amount of damage to one’s own ability to move, think, and act freely, to be sure.

Indeed, a nation that is in decent physical shape individually (which we really aren’t) is more than capable of handling, for example, natural disasters, on a much larger level. More people in good physical condition means both a larger pool of people ready for military service (a problem that is already causing problems for our military), ready to volunteer to help with disasters, and generally able to handle themselves regardless of what is happening around them. It also leads to a larger pool of people who can help those who genuinely cannot help themselves.

There is simply no way, given those conditions, for the country to do anything other than improve over time.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.


So, we’ve been at this new format for a few months now. I’ve had enough time to see what needs to change as we continue.

So this month, we’re going to take a break, and discuss tone, subject matter.

1.) Tone. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to start charging towards Blowback talking about suicide and criminal justice reform, does it?

So we won’t.

Next month we will update 2016’s Lethal Ignorance, and 2017’s Improvement. We will discuss the latest in regards to the obesity epidemic, Crossfit, and all forms of weightlifting.

In June, we will lead into Blowback with a quick discussion on free speech. From the shadowbanning happening on major platforms, to the sudden relative silence of Antifa, to how the “major” platforms are essentially giving their competition all the ammo they actually need to grow rapidly. We will, of course, briefly touch on Blowback itself as well.

The point of both will be to lighten the tone of the Run going into Blowback. Admittedly, we’ll be dealing with much graver subject matter on the other side.

2.) Subjects. Looking over the second half of 2018 one theme stands out.

Our culture, to be frank, finds whatever reason it can to dispose of or destroy people. Whether it’s essentially hiding the homeless though “hostile architecture” (rather than helping many of them not be homeless), making felons of drug addicts (as opposed to getting them treatment, or at the very least reasons to stay sober), and absolutely refusing to allow people to move on from an extremely checkered past (or even a single errant social media post); our culture will do whatever it can to either decimate or conceal anybody for just about any reason.

Except, that’s not actually helping anything but a mob’s own self-aggrandizement.

In the second half of 2018, we’ll examine quite possibly some of the hardest subjects in the Run’s history. We will, of course, update Debt (with an article that is currently 2,000 words long). But in addition to criminal justice, we will discuss drug addiction. Specifically, we will look into the opioid crisis, rehabilitation programs, and how the weightlifting/powerlifting community is helping in its own way.

In November, just prior to the annual Stand Down, the Run will go through just about every major article and update it. The reason for this came about while doing research on Iniquity. It became clear rather quickly that I was nowhere near getting deep enough on the subject of sex/human trafficking to do the topic justice. In addition, about two months after Blade was released, a spike in knife crime in the UK led to London’s murder rate matching that of New York City. This, frankly, serves as evidence above all else that it is never the weapon, it is always the person. As we have discussed numerous times here, a person too violent to be trusted is a person too violent to be released.

The longer-form articles are spread out as once-a-month updates. Blowback will, of course, serve as July’s.

But the new format is working well, and in all honesty is considerably more interesting from a writing perspective. It’s honestly very likely the way the Run should have always been.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.

Newsroom: April 2018

This week, a ton of stuff in relation to background checks, New York looks to get credit card companies to stop taking firearms purchases, and checks surge in Florida.

1.) Background Checks. Apparently thinking that the problem with an incomplete data set is that the info isn’t held long enough, gun control organizations, and at least one Congresswoman, want to hold onto NICS data for Midnight Run: Origins, the purpose of the Second Amendment was always about the right of the People, not of militias. Watch that video carefully.

2.) Gun Sales. Of course, recent stats suggest that credit card companies would be cutting themselves off from a windfall, as led to a surge shortly after they were signed into law.

In other words, every time it is proven that gun controllers really do want to take guns, they only serve to defeat their own purpose.

However, Jonathan over at Graphical Representation, has a different take that is worth considering given the recent action YouTube has taken against gun channels

In turn, I think that is a core concept that the pro-rights advocates do not comprehend as well. “Gun control” extremists do not want to regulate firearms. They do not even want to regulate you. They want to destroy knowledge, pure and simple. Though, if they could kill a few peaceful, law-abiding Americans along the way, a disturbing number of them would be sanguine with that.

So, in essence, gun control survives only on ignorance, and gun controllers are hell-bent on making as many people as ignorant as possible.

It was never about gun control, it was always about people control.

Stay alert. Stay informed. Stay free.

Blue Line Update

Back in 2015, the topic of law enforcement was center stage. Specifically, what law enforcement does, how they should be governed, and the subject of abuse of power were all major topics that, while important, ended up largely being split into camps where police were either always right or always wrong.

Back in September, we discussed just about every square inch of the topic in three Midnight Run updates.
Blue Line provided the overview.
Blue Blood focused on attacks on police, both physically and politically.
Blue Bond closed by focusing on the response to those attacks and what has now become known as “Back The Blue.”

This week, we update what we can, based on what little stats we have. Primarily, we will discuss the latest statistics on Line Of Duty deaths, a change in the political climate, and a look back at the 2016 Dallas shooting.

1.) Baseline. As with Blue Line, it is worth stating a few things upfront. In this debate, you have people who believe that police can do no wrong, and people who believe police can do no right. Both are completely asinine at best and fundamentally dangerous at worse. To presume that police are always right, no matter their actions, is essentially to allow for any abuse of power because “there must have been something the suspect did.” Likewise, to presume that police are always wrong is to assume that there is no reason for police to exist, and indeed that society can get along just fine without some sort of central authority, or at least an organization focused on maintaining some semblance of order.

We don’t accept either viewpoint here. We never have.

2.) War On Cops. Since the original Blue Line, there has been a ton of literature on the so-called “War On Cops.” Some outlets, like Reason Magazine, have said that there is not and never was any such thing, pointing to statistics showing that line of duty deaths have never been lower. The Mises Institute has flat-out asked “Where’s the Evidence?”

However, strictly looking at line of duty deaths simply isn’t a good way to discuss whether there is (or at least was) a “war on cops.” In December of 2016, National Public Radio’s Martin Kaste did a report on how events like the Dallas shooting have lead to the perception that law enforcement officers are themselves under siege. In other words, it’s not just about the hard numbers, it’s about whether police believe they are themselves under siege. That perception is changing how police operate, often with much more hesitation than they normally would have.

Part of that perception, of course, is due to the subject becoming politically-charged. According to a July 2016 article in Politico, the head of the National Association of Police Organizations told FOX News that then-President Obama helped to ignite anti-police sentiment.

“I think [the Obama administration] continued appeasements at the federal level with the Department of Justice, their appeasement of violent criminals, their refusal to condemn movements like Black Lives Matter, actively calling for the death of police officers, that type of thing, all the while blaming police for the problems in this country has led directly to the climate that has made Dallas possible, William Johnson, the executive director of the National Association of Police Organizations, said in an interview with Fox on Friday morning.

Johnson said although the Thursday night shooting of law enforcement officers reminded him of “the violence in the streets in the 60’s and 70’s,” he pointed out how Obama’s response appeared different than his predecessors.

“I think one of the big differences then was you had governors and mayors and the president — whether it was President Johnson or President Nixon, Republican or Democrat — condemning violence against the police and urging support for the police,” Johnson said. “Today that’s markedly absent. I think that’s a huge difference, and that’s directly led to the climate that allows these attacks to happen.”

This “War on cops” has been blamed also for a recruitment shortage, among other things.

(It’s worth noting that, more recently, the head of one of New York’s largest police unions said that a lot of recent NYPD resignations were due to low pay. This news has itself become a political issue, as mayor Bill de Blasio has called it a “classic union play.”)

3.) Trump. The shift from President Obama to President Trump also seems to have brought about a shift in how law enforcement is perceived (in most cases). Trump has regularly praised the efforts of law enforcement, and the new tone from DC has not gone unnoticed. Trump has called anti-police sentiment “defamation” and has called police “the thin blue line between civilization and chaos.”

Jim Pasco, the Exec. Director of the National Fraternal Order of Police, told the Washington Times in December of 2017 that “Arguably the most significant thing a president can do is use the bully pulpit to reflect his support for law enforcement. To this point in his presidency, he has certainly gone out of his way to do that. That resonates within the profession, and it’s received very favorably.”

In the interest of balance, it’s worth noting that there has occasionally been some friction between law enforcement and the Trump administration. This seems to have something to do with the investigation into Russia’s work during the election, and specifically former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. McCabe has since been fired after it was “determined that he lied to investigations reviewing the bureau’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s email server.”

In general, however, the shift from Obama to Trump has seen a marked change in tone from DC, and the lack of support coming from the DC seems to have kicked down a lot of support for vehemently anti-police movements.

And that, thankfully, seems to have at least somewhat reduced tensions in the debate.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.

Newsroom: March 2018

Way too much to cover this week. We’re going to basically cover everything that has happened in relation to the Parkland shooting. This week, the “violent video game” trope is resurrected from the early 2000s, multiple updates to state legislative efforts, a GOP debate in PA, and one or two likely-doomed bills in Congress.

1.) Violent Video Games. Let us get this out of the way and never speak of it again. For some reason, despite there being no connection between the Parkland shooter and video games, and despite a doesn’t exist) on violent video games. President Trump had a handful of gaming executives, Media Research Center’s Brent Bozell, and Dave Grossman come to the White House for one of many “listening sessions” he has held in recent weeks. Apparently had no interest in games whatsoever.

Of course, it’s also worth noting that this takes place in the post-Brown v. Electronic Merchants Association world, and that video games are indeed protected by the First Amendment, as Vox was quite eager to note.

2.) Massie. Definitely going against the grain of recent legislative efforts, Representative Thomas Massie has introduced a bill that, rather than raising the age to own a rifle to 21, would instead lower the age to own a handgun to 18. Unfortunately, as Bearing Arms notes, the current climate isn’t exactly conducive to reducing restrictions on firearms.

3.) Age discrimination. The National Shooting Sports Foundation has warned FFLs that the recent trend of unilaterally raising the age to purchase a rifle may have legal consequences. Dick’s Sporting Goods, among other retail stores, have said they will not sell firearms to people under 21, despite the law stating that people can at least own a rifle at 18. The NSSF places its entire argument on state and local “age discrimination” laws.

4.) GVROs. The idea of pre-emptively taking somebody’s firearms because they “might” be a risk has also been floated in the wake of the Parkland shooting. Bearing Arms has an excellent op-ed on the has already seen one firearm confiscated.

5a.) State’s Fights: New York. Somehow managing to find ways to make gun laws tighter, New York has passed five new gun control bills ranging from bump stock bans, to GVROs, to 10-day waiting periods.

5b.) State’s Fights: Utah. Utah, meanwhile, rejected the idea of and invited swift legal action by the NRA as a result. The bill raises the age to buy a rifle to 21, puts in a 3 day waiting period, and according to Bay News 9 “includes new checks to prevent guns from falling into the hands of the mentally ill.”

The NRA’s lawsuit focuses on the age to purchase a rifle.

Next time, we update the Blue Line series. A look at violence against police, the current statistics on line-of-duty deaths, and more. In April, we will put the long-form discussions on hold for a moment, and lay out a rough sketch for the second half of 2018 on the Midnight Run, including Blowback and the concept of following up on previous updates more frequently (as opposed to, for example, the four-year gulf between Debt and its upcoming follow-up in May).

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.


A few years ago, in Dirt and Blood, we examined the lethality of weapons other than firearms. This week, we will return to that discussion, with a focus on knives. There simply isn’t much in regards to fists that was not covered in the original D&B (apart from this BBC article covering one-punch deaths), first of all. Secondly, knives have suddenly become a major topic of discussion in many ways. In London, crime involving knives surged in 2017 to its highest point in six years. Beyond that, however, is the rather concerning notion that knives have become the “weapon of choice” among terrorist groups, as a Canadian government report shows.

The purpose of the Run this week, in brief, is to examine the rise of the knife as a terrorist tool, it’s role in crime (particularly in areas with tight gun restrictions), and to demonstrate that an individual without a gun is not, in anyway, less of a threat to somebody.

1.) Lethality. An object is either lethal or it isn’t. A man armed with a brick is still a danger in a one-on-one situation. Massad Ayoob has an excellent piece from 2014 called “The Dangerous Myth of Hierarchy of Lethality” that beautifully lays out how a knife in many cases has an advantage over a firearm (never jams, doesn’t need ammo), and also goes into blunt impact weaponry. The Odyssey expands upon this, going into the mindset of a criminal. Specifically, the Odyssey’s Taylor Glowacki argues that, since a criminal intent on harm will find a way regardless, it is naive to assume that the lack of a firearm somehow makes the person less dangerous. (This is why releasing someone while banning them from owning firearms is itself contradictory; it acknowledges that the person is too dangerous to be released.) Taylor says in part:

Taking a look at other countries who have limited gun rights are also proof that reducing gun rights do not reduce the rate of violence, crime or shootings. Russia, for example has extremely strict regulations on owning a firearm and had a period of time when they were even banned, but yet they have a higher rate of homicide than the United States. In Russia there were about 21,000 homicides, and in the United States there were about 13,000 in a given year. Russia’s rate is almost twice that of the United States, and they have far less guns and gun access. The homicide rate, as well as the crime rate in the United States, is actually decreased from the past 10 years, and guns haven’t been restricted. With that being said, if crime rates are reducing and guns aren’t restricted, why restrict them now?

2.) Crime. Let us turn from that to the knife as a tool of criminals. The chief example about gun control and knife crime is almost always the United Kingdom, and frankly 2017 was no exception. Knife crime rose 23% in the country, with 37,443 offenses (compared to 6,694 gun crimes). 80 people in the country were killed due to stabbings.

The mass stabbing in China back in 2014, which saw 29 people killed and over 100 injured is another example, and in fact. knife attack statistics in China have been referred to as misleading and possibly based on falsified information.

3.) Terrorism. Beyond that, however, the knife has become a prime tool for terrorism, as a report from Canada’s public safety department shows. In the Executive Summary of Public Safety Canada’s report, the agency says:

We have witnessed an increase of low-sophistication, high-impact terrorist attacks around the world. In particular, we have seen the increased use of knives and vehicles in attacks, such as the attack that took place recently in Edmonton, in which five people were injured; and in New York, in which eight people were killed and several more seriously injured.

It should not be too much of a surprise, given the tendency of terrorists to search for less easily-detectable, and in some cases outright makeshift weaponry to achieve their goals. (We saw such makeshift weapons in the 2017 bombing in Manchester, England, discussed here in the Tactical Review “Shock Value.”)

We have discussed at length in the Midnight Run how terrorists, and frankly mass killers general seek to create maximum impact with minimal effort and an almost skeletal planning system.

Meanwhile, FOX News has a remarkable piece showing Islamic terror’s embrace of the knife as a primary tool, almost to the point of fetishization. Not only does the FOX bit discuss the knife as an object in terms of its tactical use, but also how songs have been written about it and even how it has become a popular baby name.

4.) Bottom line. The purpose of this week’s Run is not to instill some irrational paranoia, or to propose something ludicrous and impossible like banning knives. Rather, it is to continue the thesis of Dirt And Blood which is that anything can be used as a lethal weapon. The knife has rather obvious uses in modern life, but it also has uses as a lethal weapon. It is all dependent on the person using it. This update also shows, to be frank, that some of the major threats in the world today neither prefer nor need firearms to do incredible damage; and indeed rely upon less obvious forms of weaponry (and less obvious forms of conversion/recruitment) to achieve their ends.

Focusing on a single weapon for political reasons only succeeds in leaving a dangerous opponent with everything else.

Back to the newsroom next time.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.

Newsroom: February 2018

This week, Everytown bets on ignorance to lobby against suppressors, Moms Demand Action compares the military to white supremacists, a long-overdue (and mediocre) exoneration of a few MARSOC Marines, and a word about elections in Texas.

1.) MARSOC. An embarassing, decade-long story is finally over, as nearly 30 MARSOC Marines were exonerated of war crimes they were accused of back in 2007. It largely came about in the form of a letter to Rep. Walter Jones that reaffirmed a court’s ruling.

The full story is on Marine Corps Times’ website and makes for stunning reading. It’s a repulsive story about Marines who did nothing wrong, but were nonetheless made examples of by the people who were supposed to have their backs.

2.) Everytown. Using the Chris Dorner case as a jumping-off point, Everytown released a statement against the Hearing Protection Act, noting that “five years ago, our nation saw what can happen when silencers end up in the wrong hands, yet Congress is trying to pass a bill that would roll back gun silencer safety laws and make it easy for people with dangerous histories to buy silencers without a background check.” This is ludicrous in two ways. Firstly, it later defeats its own thesis by acknowledging that suppressors are rarely used in crime. Secondly, suppressors would still be subject to background checks, just not the obscene Class 3 regime that they are part of now.

The ATF, as an aside, adds more detail on how rare such crimes are, with the agency’s Ronald Turk noting that only 44 people are recommended for prosecution due to “silencer-related violations”

In other words, Everytown tactfully avoids how rare an incident like Dorner actually is, and completely characterizes what Congress is actually intending to do with the law.

3.) Moms Demand. Another part of Everytown, Moms Demand Action, had a slight PR screw up this week when Everytown’s head, Shannon Watts, opined on the recent discussion about Trump looking to hold a military parade by suggesting that white supremacists already had done the same for him.

Of course, a military parade is quite different from a parade of neo-Nazis. But we’ll let that slide for now.

4.) CBS News. 60 Minutes is interviewing somebody from the US Concealed Carry Association about gun rights and the legislation moving through Congress relating to gun rights. (Hopefully they have a recording of their own.) The report broadcasts on CBS Sunday night, February 11, at 7 PM Eastern time.

5.) Grisham. Finally tonight, a brief word about Texas. In 2016, the Run referenced Open Carry Texas Founder CJ Grisham six times. In each case, he had demonstrated being exceptionally pro-gun (and frankly, pro-liberty generally). Grisham also had referenced Midnight Run: Debt a few years back.

I put all this out there because the man is now running for office as a State Representative in Texas. The Facebook page is here, and the primary is March 6th.

Good luck to the man. He certainly has the track record.
Maybe he’ll move to the FEDERAL House eventually. That would be fun to watch.

Full disclosure: No, this is not paid for by his campaign, despite my frequent interactions with Grisham.
I have, however, donated to said campaign. All of the above is entirely my own writing.

Next up, we update Dirt And Blood by talking about the knife, its effectiveness in combat, and its relatively new adoption by terrorists as a primary tool.

Stay informed. Stay alert. Stay free.

News on Firearms, Preparedness, and Civil Liberties